[Skybird]

The junta is delaying help, while the world is being warned that now the life of tens of thousands of children is at risk, which qualifies for a description of the junta commiting genocide against their own people. that is the basis from which I start - not a singular act of street crime or murder of passion negotiated at a civilm court in berlin.

I target the gangsters responsible for this lethal mess. and that you react so surprised shows me that my calculation is correct. Because they - like you - also cannot imagine so far to be personally held responsible for their brutality and cold blooded poker game, and they - like you can't imagine as well - also must not fear that they eventually will pay for their crimes with the loss of what is dearest to them: their lives, their villas and possessions, their wifes and offsprings.

Targetting the officer chorps also helps to increase the probability of a threat of revolt within the military, which also would force the junta to change.

and finally, I believe that it is reasonable to assume that gangsters acting as unscrupellous as these gangsters in uniform would raise their offsprings in the same selfish, brutal attitude and inhumane spirit that they live by themselves, so why giving them the opportunity to form the next generation of the tyranny and supression, or even conduct revenge for their fathers being executed for crimes against humanity? It would be stupid to do so.

I am aware that this is a brutal option. But encouraging this example set by the junta, endlessly giving ground to diplomnatic desasters like Screbrenica, Darfhur and now Burma, means that our western nations who are inpossession of the striking power to do what I suggest - instead become guilty of complicity.

Biblical, you said. The only thing being biblical is the perspective of a mass dying of biblical dimensions. If that could be prevented by enforcing access for aid orgnbaiozations via killing more or less milizary afficers and the next egneration ready to uphold the regime, I consider it to be a good deal. Maybe it is not kind, and not nice, and not humane, and all the other things a toothless UN is so heavy about. but it is Realpolitik causing effective results. In case of Burma, we are not about trying to install our economic interests, or our political systems, and make them subjugate to our civilisartion. Burma is not Iraq. It is about preventing genocide, and saving tens and hundreds of thoisuands of people. At Screbrenica, NATO should have cluster-bombed the Serbish forces in the area, no matter what the Un thinks of it. In Darfhur, we should have chased, bombed and killed the Djandjawhid and the Sudanese government. And in Burma, we should threaten to kill the generals themselves and the next generation coming after them.

Good intentions is not enough. You also need realsitic options. Subjugating to the general's demands is creating more of this in the future. Killing them, but saving the country and rescuing the people, is