Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TDK1044
Obama's stategic approach to the campaign has blown the arrogant Hillary off the map. Just look at the most recent example. Bush makes a statement about not siiting down with terrorists. The Obama people immediately see the opportunity to cement in the minds of the American people who the Democratic nominee is.
|
You are quite right TDK (see below). This latest spat is getting much more interesting than any up coming primary - and dare I say it, I think with much more substance as to the choice to be made as to who gets to be president.
This just came through:
" ---------------------------------------------------------
First Read: The day in politics by NBC News for NBC News
---------------------------------------------------------
FIRST THOUGHTS.
*** Bush's Gift To Obama: When President Bush -- thousands of miles away in Israel -- decided to fire his thinly veiled shot at Obama yesterday, it was a giant gift to the Illinois senator and his campaign. Why? One, it essentially kept Clinton on the sidelines just two days after her big West Virginia victory. Two, Obama's opponent was no longer Clinton or McCain, but the man with the 27% job-approval rating. And three, it rallied Democrats to Obama's side. Even neutral Dems, like Joe Biden, Rahm Emanuel and Harry Reid, quickly leapt to Obama's defense. Some Democrats might be deeply divided right now. Pro-choice women are angry at NARAL's endorsement of Obama; Clinton supporters are upset that Obama is looking like the eventual nominee; and some African Americans are unhappy with the Clintons. But what's the best way to unify them all? Give them an excuse to turn their attention to Bush. And this will all play out another day -- and will likely extend into the weekend -- as Obama will respond this afternoon to Bush at his rally with Tom Daschle in South Dakota, NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports. Obama will react to both what he considers Bush's politicization of foreign policy and the substance of Bush's attack.
*** The Power Of Bush: Regardless of whether you believe Bush yesterday did the right thing or not as far as the unwritten rules of partisan politics, it is a reminder of how the president can toss an issue grenade into the middle of the campaign and change the narrative in a nanosecond. But we have to ask: Did anyone in McCain's orbit get a head's up on this? After all, Bush's remarks -- and then McCain's response to them -- overshadowed McCain's big "2013" speech that he gave to put more room between himself and Bush. They also undercut that very speech after McCain essentially agreed with Bush's assessment. As the Obama campaign pointed out, McCain delivered "a lofty speech about civility and bipartisanship in the morning, and then embrace[d] George Bush's disgraceful political attack in the afternoon." Now, McCain's past (and possibly contradictory) statements on Hamas are gaining fresh scrutiny today with an op-ed by Jamie Rubin in today's Washington Post."
This is one of the things I love about politics - the discourse. It can turn on a dime. From "bitter" to "Hard working whites" to "100 years in Iraq". Throw a stone into the political pond and you never know how strong the ripple.