Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bradclark1
I whole heartedly accept it. I've read both sides and made a decision. Until someone comes out with something other than "it's political" "it's a plot against the third world" or just "no it's not" my mind remains unchanged. The thing that takes any credibility from the anti-gw crowd is that there is no organization in the rebuttal. No scientific organization that says no and here's why. Most so called scientist aren't even specialized in anything remotely to do with the climate. It's rare that the reasons for the rebuttals even match in data. If both sides could come up with a standard formula for measuring it would cut down on most bs from both sides but that ain't never going to happen. As I've said numerous times I hope I'm wrong but I've seen nothing to change my mind. I don't argue preferences I argue what I see.
|
OK. Fair enough.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fish
From here maybe?
|
Stupid. Just like Peak Oil. Do you really think that view is held by most Christians Fish? When did Ben Stein become the Representative of Christianity?
More of the same nonsense from you I guess.