Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Funny thing is if you do your masters as you do here you..........Look at your last sentence here. Then read what the article says.
|
This post of yours makes no sense whatsoever. No surprise there.
Quote:
|
Now where I went to school "had" was past tense so how can "had" mean forecasts?
|
You aren't making any worthy points here at all. Reading and comprehending what he's saying is that the global warming nut derived a theory somehow that global warming had caused hurricanes. And as a result, when they saw a warmer year a couple of years ago, he predicted hurricanes. The global warming nut was of course wrong. And now, instead of refine the theory, or admit error, bury it and pretend it never occured or has no significance. We'll be seeing more of it from the man-made warming types in the future. This is only the beginning. Your last response was full of it, and full of something else to boot.