View Single Post
Old 04-16-08, 12:10 PM   #12
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntEater
...Add to that the "nuclear exit", a typical german compromise.
Re nuclear power, you can basically:
- continue it, thereby retaining a very expensive but extremely reliable energy source and a huge high tech industry with endless export possibilities, but risking a disaster and having to deal with waste
- abandon it, reducing the risk and waste while losing the industry and being forced to invest in more emission intensive power sources like coal...
Nuke tech has come a long way in recent years. A meltdown is near impossible (the human element is removed, though manual controls still exist for over-ride), and containiment in an event if it could possibly occur is secure. And, you get free power with no harmful effects on the enviroment - with near perfectly efficient reactors and almost no waste. Its the only way forward, unless we start getting antimatter reactors.

-S

PS. The US has started building its first reactors in decades - check TX.
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote