Quote:
|
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeepIron
Time to move on August. You were wrong, we both know it and you lack even the simple grace to admit it.
|
Military service has long been seen as an indicator of a candidates commitment to the nation. Not one single thing you have said refutes that simple fact DeepIron so it seems if anyone lacks simple grace it is you. |
:rotfl:August, not once have you substantiated your simple "fact" that "Military service has long been seen as an indicator of a candidates commitment to the nation". You "state" it as such and just expect people to accept it. Well I don't accept it and I have more than refuted your "fact" and proved that once again, your long on mouth and real short on substance.
And what of those who did military service not because they wanted to, but because they HAD to as mandated by law? They didn't want to be there in the first place. I guess you think that because someone was "drafted" or that Daddy pulled some strings and they went in, got their time done and got out as soon as possible, that they display some worthy "indicator of committment"? And when people find out that "So and so" has some special treatment in the service, that they look upon it as a positive aspect? Your "fact" disintegrates at every turn.
August, show me ONE, just ONE scrap of evidence to support your opinion. C'mon, August it can't be that hard. If what you say is accurate, and is accepted as factual by more people than just yourself, then it should be a simple matter to substantiate your point of view. There must be some reputable source you can link to? Isn't there?