I wasnt intending to find any fault with the article myself only the
single point which I felt wasnt your error but likely someone elses
that compiled the original list. I think the only real problem even
with the point is that it doesnt limit itself to US subs which would
then make the claim 100% correct. its more a semantics thing I think
than anything else. Personally I for one am a great fan of posts
that fill in historical backgrounds for people.
I still think this is a great thread myself.
M
[edit] also im trying to resolve the difference between listed US and British
tonnage measurements I think the brits used long tonnes but I may be wrong
still looking.
|