Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Letum
Are your moral princibles really so flimsy that you would think it fit to abandon them if
you belived that animals, bacteria and viruses change over generations depending on
their enviroment?
|
I didn't say that didn't happen, and you can't deny that PETA is not the logical conclusion of Darwanism either.  Face it - you already know your future! |
You can not get moral conclusions from logic.
Unless you have found a way round the is-ought gap.
PETA may be a irrational conclusion from Darwinism, but that just shows peta is
irrational and we all know that.