Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ishmael
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sonar732
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ishmael
I saw this and the ones they had mounted on the top of the BW APC. My first thought on countermeasures were the following:
1 or 2 RPG rounds to take out the shotgun mount and EFPs mounted at 45 degree angles to hit the sloped sides at a perpendicular angle.
|
Leave it to Ishmael to come up with countermeasures to our weapons.  |
But it's not one of "our" weapns. It was designed for and used by a private mercenary organization with no ties nor alliegance to either Constitution or government. They'll use them for whoever pays them the most money against the "Inevitable Consequence of Progress" of people unable to resist. |
You and your left-wing spin crack me up...you obviously have such issues with the contracting companies in Iraq that you can't see the history of the AA 12. The
history of this weapon is plainly
before Iraq...wait...you'll state that in 1972, we had an interest in giving this weapon plans to our contractors knowing that in the 35 years we'll be in Iraq. They spent another 18 years refinning the weapon.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by military.com
Beyond our military are elements of Homeland Security that have expressed great interest in the AA-12, such as or the guarding of our nuclear facilities. Foreign governments who are allies of the U.S., such as the Philippines, are also very interested, but in addition to them the AA-12 will be available only to the military and agencies of our Federal Government.
|
Defense Review Article with so many video links you can't shake a stick at...not to mention the continued interest by the US Marine Corps!
It's all a conspiracy!!!!!!