I don't see where you're getting the headline from.
I wonder if Craig would be commenting if it was another politician on trial
. The ACLU seems to defend the rights of those who oppose it's existence just as fervently as those who support it.
I can see where the basis for this ruling comes from, but also the arguments against. This quote makes it clear that the ruling is not without basis.
Quote:
|
The ACLU also noted that Craig was originally charged with interference with privacy, which it said was an admission by the state that people in a bathroom stall expect privacy.
|