Thread: SH4 is not SH3!
View Single Post
Old 01-07-08, 09:49 AM   #4
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,291
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaleu. Jochen Mohr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CptCrunch
This may attract a great deal of approbium but I feel have to say it ...

I totally adore SH3 and GWX. When SH4 came out I rushed out and bought it.
I hate it. The 'improved' SH4 graphics remind me of a cartoon and lack the realism of SH3 - Lots of pretty palm trees , ships and port structures - like finding Nemo
Not having to micromanage the crew is great but then what else is there to do when traversing thousands of miles of dull, empty, pacific ocean?
It may be that I'm an Anglo-European with a greater empathy for my native theatre of operations but somehow SH4 seems to lack any kind of soul and oh yeah ... - it's JUST PLAIN BORING .
cant agree more

i put the TM and RFB or whatever its name is on it and it STAYS CRAP
its been ages since i took it out of the box, i think i even threw it away.
With all due respect, SH3 started much the same way. Three years later and SH3 is as it is now. I picked up SH3 when it first came out. Put it away after three months. BORING! GWX got me back into it. SH4 is still under a year on the market and has grown very nicely. Other than that, show some respect for the modders who create RFB and TM. I would like to say more about your comment but I might find myself in the brig

Have a nice day and thread locked. This will do nothing but start flames.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline