Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skybird
However, to answer your question
|
but you didn't answer it!
You just waffled for another few thousand words.
Either you would have qualms or you wouldn't. I can conceive of no other possible
answer and yet, you give neither.
Instead you talk about suicide attacks, the Iranian Gulf and other such things which
have no bearing whatsoever.
Thus, I ask again:
If you have two options, namely:
1) Win the war at 5pm by killing several billion civilians, without loss of your own troops or material.
Or
2) win the war at 6pm by waiting a hour, without loss of your own troops or material.
Would you have any qualms about choosing option 1?
If you do have problems with option 1, then why is this; given that you believe
that morality has no place in making wartime decisions.
Once again: either you would have qualms or you wouldn't. I can conceive of no
other possible answer.
To save my time and yours, please try to limit your reply to 200 words if you can.