SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

K-61 · 12-15-07, 02:26 PM

I think people should not put too much into the version number "2.0" as compared to "1.3." In the software industry [Hello! Microsoft?] a new release gets the ".0" treatment, which we have learned over the years to equate to "new, but buggy." As such, I fear that some people are regarding "2.0" as less stable than "1.3," the ".3" meaning it has gone through several debugs and is now stable. This is simply not the case with GWX 2.0; the new revision number simply reflects the added content. The previous reliability has been preserved. Please do not be put off by the version numbering format. This is Grey Wolves, NOT Microsoft.

12-15-07, 02:26 PM	#12
K-61 Grey Wolf Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Ontario Posts: 795 Downloads: 39 Uploads: 0	I think people should not put too much into the version number "2.0" as compared to "1.3." In the software industry [Hello! Microsoft?] a new release gets the ".0" treatment, which we have learned over the years to equate to "new, but buggy." As such, I fear that some people are regarding "2.0" as less stable than "1.3," the ".3" meaning it has gone through several debugs and is now stable. This is simply not the case with GWX 2.0; the new revision number simply reflects the added content. The previous reliability has been preserved. Please do not be put off by the version numbering format. This is Grey Wolves, NOT Microsoft. __________________