After these issues already had been discussed and negotiated in the 80s and during my schooldays, one has reached consensus that after twenty years of negotiating, two more years of negotiations are still needed, before the
real important negotiations should be launched. In overtime the US made a U-turn and agreed that negotiating is the way to go, but not before the EU made a U-turn itself and had dropped all demands for oligatory commitments, time tables, criterion numbers - nothing of it is left. China at the end boiled in hot anger and demanded an apology of the climate panel for beeing so stubborn to give all those unfriendly perspectives and disturbing minds and economical interests by that. I suppose their hot anger is soon to be cooled again when the next floodings hit their country.
What this conference has accieved is the only one thing we could not need: more of HOT AIR, and nothing get's done. Nevertheless, everyone is boasting. the winner of it is the US, having fulfilled almost all it's mission goals that had been reported even in advance. This victory is: preventing obligations, and installing more delays, without needing to put off the shiny white jacket and calling of the party afterwards. Tells something about the goals of US climate policies.
Meanwhile:
Quote:
Last Friday, the Senate failed to invoke cloture on the Energy Bill, allowing Senators who oppose some of the renewable energy provisions to filibuster the legislation. The Senate is expected to bring a revised Bill to the floor sometime this week.
At issue is the $13 billion in tax incentives taken from the oil and natural gas industries and given to the renewable energy industries. Because the Democrats have pledged a “pay as you go” approach to crafting legislation, they argue that it is necessary to take tax incentives from the well-established fossil energy industries to give to the relatively nascent renewable energy industries.
There are also concerns from Senators about the Renewable Electricity Standard (RES), which would require utilities to get 15% of their electricity from renewable resources by 2020. Some politicians and lobbyists say that a RES will raise electricity prices and put an unfair burden on utilities. But as the cost of conventional sources of energy continues to rise, industry advocates argue that increased reliance on renewables will lower retail electricity rates for consumers in the coming years.
“At a time when the country is buffeted by growing demand for electricity, higher energy costs, and climate change and energy security concerns, a cornerstone of any energy bill should be to promote renewable energy,” said Randall Swisher, Executive Director of the American Wind Energy Association. “The Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) and the extension of clean energy tax incentives that are included in the House Bill should therefore also be included in the final Senate Bill.”
A Senate vote on the Energy Bill is expected sometime this week. However, it is unclear if the Bill will include all of the renewable energy provisions that were in the House version that passed last week.
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com...story?id=50804
|
For those not familiar with the French and American detail of filibusters and cloture: a filibuster is an attempt to prevent a voting by keeping on to talk during debate, endlessly, for hours if needed, on all and everything, to babble and babble and babble, and the babbler can only be stopped if 60% of the chamber's members vote in favor to stop the talking head. In other words: a filibuster is a final act of despair, and it is meant to be destructive from A to Z. If a lobby, a party, a group needs to use filibusters, it tells you something about how desperatly they are trying to prevent any voting at all.
Climate death is not our fate. It is our CHOICE.