In a way, you are the liar, August, because you deliberately ignore the context of my posting and by that twist it'S meaning, although I am absolutely sure that you are knowing that the whole post where you ripped it from has been adressing the issue of this thread: the inherent claim by america that it has the right to overrule the sovereignity and laws of foreign nations, ullustrated in the story that the thread starter told at the start.
Is it so difficult for you to discuss something without trying again and again some rethoric tricks on people not agreeing with you, to give them a bad name where your argument is not sufficient to counter theirs? I'm getting tired of it, really. It is foul style. Lacking sportsmanhsip, if you want. Unfairness. However you call it.
You could try this until next year, but still you will not prevent me from countering your self-centered claims concerning the moral validity of america's self-perceptiin when behaving like being discussed in this thread. All you illustrate to people by that is that you arguments are not sufficient, so that you need to use rethoric cheats and tricks. there are people claiming rethoric to be a high art, and they even train it, but to me it is just an attempt to manipulate people, and deceive over lacking argument. It does not impress me at all. You either have an argument where I can see the point in it, or you have not - that is all.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
|