SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

MarkShot · 11-29-07, 06:14 PM

Here is the proof for that chart.

This is stock SC 1.08. I used the SW (easier to demo) and the contact is a close 688i in the first case making 5kts and the second case 30kts. Testing done at around 1400' for both subs.

Notice the thickness of the BB contact and the SNR value; a difference of 250% and you can hear on the speakers too.

I submit to you that the assumption that Sonalysts only corrected SC bugs in DW may be an incorrect assumption, and, in fact, Sonalysts in producing DW may have well introduced new bugs into the game engine as this clearly illustrates. Whoever made that chart, clearly had run some detailed tests.

Me, I play SC, SCX, and DW-LWAMI. Why discard a perfectly good game like SC just because DW is newer? (I still play AOD by the way too.)

11-29-07, 06:14 PM	#8
MarkShot Ace of the Deep Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,134 Downloads: 93 Uploads: 0	Here is the proof for that chart. This is stock SC 1.08. I used the SW (easier to demo) and the contact is a close 688i in the first case making 5kts and the second case 30kts. Testing done at around 1400' for both subs. Notice the thickness of the BB contact and the SNR value; a difference of 250% and you can hear on the speakers too. I submit to you that the assumption that Sonalysts only corrected SC bugs in DW may be an incorrect assumption, and, in fact, Sonalysts in producing DW may have well introduced new bugs into the game engine as this clearly illustrates. Whoever made that chart, clearly had run some detailed tests. Me, I play SC, SCX, and DW-LWAMI. Why discard a perfectly good game like SC just because DW is newer? (I still play AOD by the way too.) __________________ War games, not wars! --- Only a small few profit from war (that should not stand)!