:rotfl: More then 3/4 of your post talk about Gore. If you don't accept Gores reasons thats immaterial it's up to the individual. If you don't agree fine, don't, but what I gather from your posts is that if Gore has anything to do with the environment it's automatically wrong. Did Gore look stupid because of some of his non facts? Yes he did. Does that nullify the rest of what he is saying? No it doesn't. I've made my points plus discredited every reference you've shown in this thread because you don't research anything. You see a paragraph that suits your needs and go on about how great that scientist or meteorologist is because he is saying what you want to see and if you spent a minute to see who this person was you'd see if this person is credible or not and you wouldn't look like a fool when they are shot down. Before you go on about discrediting any references I've made, if you can't list them you don't have anything to say. Also if you think I haven't answered any of your questions tell me what I've missed and I'll address them because as far as I can tell you haven't asked any questions you just rant.
Here's a case in point:
You didn't even know what you were referencing because it's a scientific article about different theories. There was nothing to disagree with. So check your own eyes and mind.
Let me tell you something. I would love to be proved wrong on this subject. It would make my day because I worry about mankind's future (yeah, really). Specificly I worry about my grandkids and their kids and I believe this is as serious as being rained on by nuke missiles.