[CB..]

sounds like we're all suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning..it's rotting our brains...not enough oxygen in the atmosphere..too many polutants for the brain to function correctly...and there's too much CO2 in the atmosphere causing problematic climate issues ...what we really need is something that removed CO2 from the atmosphere and replaced it with oxygen....oh dang...there is something ...what was it? ah yes...trees..yes that was it..shame they're chopping them down at the rate they are....yup must be all the polutants in the atmosphere rotting the brain...unless they aren't telling us something...mind you if the powers that be are daft enough to withold information from their own fellow power holders.. and movers and shakers in the political world..then one wonders what the powers that be might be prepared to withold from members of the public..

tell em all to shut up and just plant the dang forests...i still say that if we had done this 50 years ago when the debate first started.. we probably wouldn't have any climate problems at all right now.(or greatly reduced)...even with current CO2 emmissions..etc...

here we are on the bridge of the Titantic argueing over whever we are going to hit an iceburg....there's the ice burg now...are we going to hit it?...no yes maybe? under what circumstance might we hit it and under what circustances might we not hit it?..will the ship sink even if we do hit the iceburg?...will the iceburg melt before we hit it (lol)

mean time no attempt to change course is made right up to and including the moment we hit the iceburg or not as the case may be..

do you slow down when driving in fog? or do you carry on at normal driving speeds... if the climate change details are unclear to some and if information is with held...then this could be described as information "fog"...so under those circumstances ..as with the driving a car in fog image..it is FAR FAR wiser to proceed on the assumption that there is danger ahead than it is to assume that there is none...so plant the forests...if nothing else they will look better than forests of windturbines..and the trees will eat the CO2 from conventional powerstations to boot...areas of natural beauty if you plan them nicely...i don't care if you need to plant areas so large as to cover small countys..i dare say if you added all the square feet of land covered with tarmac car parks and roads in each country that would still exceed the total area of forest in the same country

we have big buisness trading their CO2 foot prints on the global market...sell em shares in your forest...that will save them a few quid...handle it right and your forests will become as much a national resource as any oil field..no imagination some folks:rotfl:

yup it is a conspiracy..a conspiracy of stupidity