[bradclark1]

I can make red text too. In fact I can even do green.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_M._Gray
Bill Gray is [often] excoriated in public, rightfully in my opinion, because he's essentially accused the entire scientific community of fraud ... and for no other reason that I can figure out other than he didn't get the funding he feels he deserves. As a scientist, he knows that the type of conspiracy theories he's suggesting simply cannot actually occur. This has led to a real loss of respect within the community for him

Gray's work has been the subject of significant criticisms.[8] The Real Climate website published a critique of the key points in one of Gray's papers.[7] They argue that Gray's work is fundamentally wrong because most of his pronouncements on climate change and its causes are based on 'fundamental misconceptions on the physics of climate'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_Climate
The creation of RealClimate was noticed by both the prestigious academic journals Science and Nature.[2][3]
In 2005, the editors of Scientific American recognized RealClimate with a Science and Technology Web Award, writing:[4]
A refreshing antidote to the political and economic slants that commonly color and distort news coverage of topics like the greenhouse effect, air quality, natural disasters and global warming, Real Climate is a focused, objective blog written by scientists for a brainy community that likes its climate commentary served hot. Always precise and timely, the site's resident meteorologists, geoscientists and oceanographers sound off on all news climatological, from tropical glacial retreat to "doubts about the advent of spring."
In 2006, Nature compiled a list of the 50 most popular blogs written by scientists, as measured by Technorati. RealClimate was number 3 on that list.
http://www.realclimate.org/