View Single Post
Old 10-15-07, 07:46 PM   #54
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Seems they forgot the bits in the beginning. They suffer from selective editing.

Scientists not involved in the study cautioned, however, that current climate change is so driven by pollution from power plants, industry, and other human activity that it is nearly impossible to draw a meaningful conclusion about the durability of Greenland's ice.
"Whatever occurred in the past almost surely occurred much more slowly," said Raymond S. Bradley, director of the Climate System Research Center at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. "Human activity is pushing warming at a much faster rate than in the past. Change is occurring in decades or centuries, not over millennia."
Not even close. If you read my earlier posts, you would have seen it was a Y2K bug that screwed up the NASA models, bringing them more in line with a normal warming. It is no where near as bad as the middle ages once had. The Medieval times is the time in history of the hottest weather, increasing at a faster rate than our own is now.

This evidence kind of screws up people doomsday BS they are posting all over the web.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote