Quote:
|
The judge is also very clear about the film being used as a political programme. By extrapulation the entire global warming/climate change movement is political.
|
Did you forget the quotes again or do you always spell program in the european manner? By virtue of the subject matter the film is political. Just so we get the judges meaning of the term 'political' it is 'based on or motivated by partisan or self-serving objectives' so you can toss a dime and call on the term 'extrapulation'. He said many claims in the film was fully backed up by the weight of science.
Quote:
|
You should read the entire text. You will find that the decision was very narrow in its scope but does provide precedence for future challanges to global warming/climate change what ever the left is calling it today.
|
By your comment above I'd say you haven't read the entire text. I'll send you a pdf of the court document if you want. It's only 367k. I said I didn't read all of it, I did however read most of it.
It doesn't matter as far as precedence goes. Facts are facts and the judge backs the main scientific facts of global warming. No word games can change whats a
fact and the right can't change that.