SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Ducimus · 10-12-07, 07:09 PM

>>But why not go off tot he side, flank, end around, submerge and sink them, instead?

Im thinking in terms of getting a report off, not so much as attack. Allowing an approach from the rear, you can get your report off, and your really not in a good position to attack.

At the least i think its feasible to implent this concept on task forces where you coudlnt catch them and end up in the rear anyway.

edit:

>>Wonder why they chose 4500m, it really is a rediculous range

Stock Sh3, max visual distance was 6,000 meters. Since Sh4 is built upon SH3, this didnt get changed when they upped the max visual distance to 8,000 meters. An oversight i guess.

10-12-07, 07:09 PM	#40
Ducimus Rear Admiral Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,987 Downloads: 67 Uploads: 2	>>But why not go off tot he side, flank, end around, submerge and sink them, instead? Im thinking in terms of getting a report off, not so much as attack. Allowing an approach from the rear, you can get your report off, and your really not in a good position to attack. At the least i think its feasible to implent this concept on task forces where you coudlnt catch them and end up in the rear anyway. edit: >>Wonder why they chose 4500m, it really is a rediculous range Stock Sh3, max visual distance was 6,000 meters. Since Sh4 is built upon SH3, this didnt get changed when they upped the max visual distance to 8,000 meters. An oversight i guess.