View Single Post
Old 10-11-07, 12:53 PM   #7
swdw
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 921
Downloads: 75
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater
Interesting, a quick test with a 33% increased DC hit vs a tambor a couple meters from the hull, and I was very much still in the game. I think for a 6m sure kill to be realistic, heck, even a 3m sure kill, the DCs might need to be very very much more powerful.

tater
Hi again, posted this in the 1.3 patch and Japanese ASW topic, then saw this thread:

from http://www.submarine-history.com/NOVAthree.htm
by Cpt Brayton Harris USN (ret)

1940
U. S. Navy ran depth-charge tests against an operational submarine (for most of the test, moored underwater without crew). They found that 300 pounds of TNT was not very
effective; the explosive charge was doubled to 600 pounds.


(later dropped to 400, when they added a lead weight for faster sinking)

I do think you are correct in the navy thinking along those lines prior to 1940 and that line of thinking may have been derived from the DC tests on the USS G-1 in 1921.
__________________
"There are only two types of ships- submarines...... and targets" Unknown

"you wouldn't catch me on a ship that deliberately sinks itself"- comment to me from a surface sailor.

System:
AMD 6300 3.5 GHz | 32GB DDR3 | SATA 300 320GB HD, SATA III 1TB HD, SATA III 1.TB HD | ASUS Sonar DS sound card
NVIDIA 1660 Super OC | Windows 10
swdw is offline   Reply With Quote