Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JScones
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigboywooly
Too many late nights Jaesen ?
My post was to WS not andylegate and by quoting I guess so was the Kpts
|
:rotfl: My point exactly.  Think about it. 
Then compare his response to the responses of some of the other GWX team members.
Methinks it's someone else who is the one having too many late nights, not me. |
My post was indeed directed at Wilhelmschulz. Its just more of the same from him... apparently frustration born of impatience and/or shock effect due to recklessness.
Furthermore, I don't have any problems with your post Andylegate. Following on to all of the detailed responses here, I can only add a titdbit:
Modding the sensors in SH3 can be compared to tying your boots without enough string. Most of the time, things appear to work as designed, and this is in accordance with the preponderance of annecdotal evidence. However, there is nothing we can do... or anyone else can do... that will make a "perfect" representation for everyone. What a lot of people fail to realize is that changing a sensor sensitivity setting by even a TENTH of a point in some cases... can cause a chain reaction of unintended effects.
Sure, I'm rather protective concerning the sensor modifications in GWX. They work well and when something is
working the temptation to "FIX" them must be resisted. The risk of monkeying with the sensors now isn't worth the squeeze.
They were asleep... now they are awake. We can all take comfort from that.