View Single Post
Old 10-02-07, 03:19 AM   #7
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurtz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Quote:
[Lots of quotes]
I understood you clearly. To which I repeat:

Unbelievable moral equivalency rubbish.
Are you skirting the issue by rubbishing it or do you think that the ends is always a justification for the means?
On the contrary! Ends don't justify means should be almost an ironclad rule. There was nothing wrong or evil in the means used by the US in dropping the A-bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That's exactly the point!
:hmm: So it was a justification in it's self?
I don't understand?

Isn't the only reason for a action to achive something other than the action it's self?
With the A bomb I'd look at it like this the nuke kills X number of people, the prolongation of the war kills Y number of people, if Y>X then drop bomb.

I'd probably introduce a scaling factor for X to represent them being baddies and starting the war, or am I being simplistic again?

Hehe....you haven't read the rest of the thread have you?
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote