Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
I would very simply assume that "loss prevention", in this day and age, would itself be considered "just cause", at least in cases where this occurs on private property, with the owner's posted policy notice.
Have a look at the 4th Ammendment. It originally referred to search and seizures within one's own private property. That is not the case here.
|
I did - and you are wrong. Your person and your possesions in this day and age are still your personal private property. It doesn't matter if you carry your house on your back, in your bag, or at a place of residence. You are reading it with too narrow a mindset when you interpret this to be your home only. I thought you were up and up more than this on American law? You know you don't have to submit to anything without just cause - not even open the trunk of your car to the cops over here. Ever heard of that? The 4th amendment does not simply state your place of residence.
Giving loss prevention this kind of power - that is a scary thought. It is also morally unacceptable.
-S