Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Sweden, too.
"It is not possible for anyone to understand the full text."
- Former French President Valery Giscard d'Estaing
|
With that comment he was referring to the original treaty draft that has been formed into a "harmless" treaty now. It is a much smaller document indeed, nevertheless I see the basic ideas still being included, and unchanged. the discussion and negotiations were about cosmetics and rethorics, imo, the substance remained almost unchanged. Since the thing was rejected while being called "constitution", and has not been changed substantially, I see no reason to accept this "treaty" now as a a formally legal thing, and do not see why what had been made object of a referedum before, now shall no longer be object of referendum.
For me it all is a major fraud, a farce, playacting.