View Single Post
Old 09-10-07, 09:45 AM   #7
melnibonian
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reading UK
Posts: 3,473
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Einsman
Quote:
Originally Posted by melnibonian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einsman
The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?
You're correct in what you're pointing out and the GWX Team thanks you for it. If it is possible to be fixed ti will.

Why you have to spoil everything by this kind of "silly" and "childish" comments?

The GWX Team has NOTHING to prove with respect to its determination and eagerness for work to ANYONE

CASE CLOSED
Hello again.

1. Yes, It's a subsim, not a flight sim. But, the OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float and it's not a Ar-196 but all we want the maximun of realism in this simulator.

2. It was not a silly commentary, only it was a sarcastic(*) commentary with humor without despising the work of anybody in the GWX team.

(*) ... because it is vocally oriented, sarcasm can be difficult to grasp in written form and is easily misinterpreted. To prevent this some people emphasize words with italics, bold, capitalization, and/or underlining (e.g. that’s just great); sarcastic comments on the Internet with an emoticon.

I would like to write something more, but I don't dominate this language and I don't want to be misinterpreted.

Sorry for my english

Regards.
No worries mate. I did not realised this and I appologise

We're good and cool so go forth and enjoy GWX As far as the planes are concerned as I said before if something can be done it will (it's a matter of time and practicality with the upcomming update)
melnibonian is offline   Reply With Quote