Second time in a row you mention I intentionally insulted you. I had no such intention. You asked, I answered. Also, I answered to your claim that shock tactis do not work. but that is wrong, as a matter of fact. I know that from experimental settings, and I remember that statistics on young smokers also showed a decline in youngster getting smokers or carrying on with it when being confronted with very severe visual material. And lastly I referred to police' experiences when using even physical feedback on how a crash feels, and that police says that "confrontation therapy", to summarize it, works better for them than just verbal lecturing.
And finally, I did not call anybody here an ass.
you may want to take that into account before continuing to tell me that I intentionally offended you. You tripped over a wire, and thus my reaction, and that's it.