Ok so now ill say something.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
But the last place I go for when it comes to impartiality and journalistic standards nowdays is the NY Times, which has turned into a crude mouthpiece for leftist agendas. .
|
Simillary, i typically dont read ANY link you post because i immediatly assume it's a mouthpiece for neocon warhawks. Since your always very gungho about anything dealing with American money or lives being spent in the middle east, what else is one to think?
Regardless of where that piece is posted, if its written by boots on the ground, PEOPLE THAT ARE THERE. (which we are not, therego we have no place to talk), then its a very intresting and enlighting. Its the people on the ground who have the best feel for whats going on, not some stuffed suit/uniform behind a desk somewhere, and most certainly not armchair politicians or armchair generals who are hot to trot waste american dollars and lives with absolutley no risk to themselves.
I'll say straight up to anyone who's pro war. ENLIST NOW! Of course , that requires one to "put their money where their mouth is", something alot of necon's are unwilling, or unable to do. Which in my mind, makes their pro war stances or opinions, nothing but alot of hot air.
In summary, i respect the opinion of the guys on the ground, who have to get up everyday and face that crock of **** that spoiled frat boy got us into. Im sure they're opinions vary depending on who you talk to, but in the end, its their opinons that should matter the most, regardless of where you hear it from.