I think SUBMAN1 has it right. Guns (weapons systems of all sorts) or Butter (social welfare of all sorts). The current disparity in weapons development is a very good deal for the US and not such a good deal for other 'western' nations.
As an example, currently the Brits deploy Trident D-5 nuclear missles on its Vanguard class boomers. Fine and dandy, but the US retains all control over those missles. The UK in effect leases them, and perhaps cannot use them w/out US permission. There is no transfer of technology nor a homegrown technology base to manufacture or maintain a submarine deterent.
I'm sure this is good for Britain b/c no R&D nor expensive construction or MX costs allow for more social programs which further makes it citizens reliant on the government for their lives.
I used Britain as an example but many of the western democracies work on the same paradigm.
|