View Single Post
Old 07-09-07, 08:53 PM   #12
Bill Nichols
Master of Defense
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,502
Downloads: 125
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Werewolf13
In the book Clear the Bridge by Richard O'Kane he states that while on sea trials he took the Tang down to 625+ feet. He mentions that the depth gauge pegged out at 600 feet.

While serving on USS Sandlance, SSN-660 the very first watch I stood was monitoring a pressure gauge in the Engine Room Upper level while doing angles and dangles. I was on sound powered phones and was required to read out the pressure at regular intervals during the exercise. Boring as hell and at the time I had no clue why I was doing it (backup to depth gauges up forward). So if WWII subs had pressure gauges it would have been easy for them to keep track of depth using pressure - someone could have just made a table that could have been read from.
Certainly they had pressure gauges. From the item I referenced above:

"In one action in the Pacific the Tang lost depth control, leaving the control room depth gauge pinned past its max reading of 600ft for a LOOONG time. Long afterwards, when they were both POW's, a forward torpedoman told O'Kane that he saw an external pressure gauge in that compartment go past 375psi (750ft [sic - should actually be 850!] depth), but decided not to tell O'Kane lest he decide the boat was safe to such an extreme depth and use it routinely in battle!"
__________________
My Dangerous Waters website:
Bill Nichols is offline   Reply With Quote