I like the bit where he implied that the homeless and destitute are that way because of their own fault. Its especially good because that was the "however" added to the necessary acknowledgement that there are people that don't get the care they deserve.
And there was a big point about how everyone gets care thats almost as good as insurance payers. But nobody answered how someone that has a legitimate reason for not having insurance should pay for it without being totally broke and forced into bankruptcy.
Theres alot of averaging out in that video, using majority statistics to make it sound so rosey. That the few who suffer rare diseases or need significant surgeries still end up liable wasn't addressed and also the alleged corruption of the insurance industry isn't answered. Its a selective argument that doesn't look at the whole picture.
I'll grant those are some good stats for use in an argument. But all it might have done is remind me how Michael Moore isn't always thorough in his arguments.
__________________
|