Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Beery
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torpex752
Thats correct, then the Reports used (Wahoo & Nautilus) maybe shouldnt be included either because they are transcribed, not actual scans.
|
Blimey! I'm amazed at the ways people choose to rationalize away the facts that don't fit their agenda. What next - will we be discounting evidence because it was written in blue ink and not black? I mean how far beyond ridiculous does this need to get?
I'm just gonna put a couple of these guys on my ignore list. That will save me some time and if they post anything substantial I'm sure one of the RFB users will let me know. |
So someone "questions" the accuracy of internet research and they are on an ignore list? LOL (that says allot) Far be it from me to question things on the internet, after all everything on the internet is obviously 100% accurate.
Sorry ol man, I guess I spent more time digging through cardboard boxes and actually reading WWII Submarine patrol reports, so I have a natural tendancy to "question" when something is
transcribed. I didnt say I didnt believe it. My adjenda for the record is to pass on what I have collected. I have no other adjenda than historical accuracy. (For the record, the actual final Patrol reports stored in archives are usually the second but sometimes the third draft. So I would never imply anyone lied, but I will imply a human error here or there)
Frank "Torpex" Kulick
Subsim Staff