Yaaaaay, you go girl!
First off, any argument that is predicated on an appeal to authority is a weak argument at best.
The rest of y'all seem to be arguing the Rights of Man as if those are somehow applicable to terrorists. They aren't and don't. Terrorists are inhumane scum of this earth less deserving of pity than rabid scurvy dogs delerious in the heat of the Indian noon-day sun, shrieking in terror while chasing their tails, not knowing from whence the bite of the pit viper comes.
No, the terrorist has shirked themselves of the mantle of humanity once they plotted to maim and kill as many innocent women, children and babies that their diabolical deeds can accomplish. And doubly so when they set upon implementing their own little ones to carry out their heneious objectives. They are absolutely deserved whatever contempt can be mustered out of bile soaked stomach where rage against that scourge festers and yearns for justice.
These people scoff at and mock the laws of our society, seing it weak and helpless because of them. And yet when it suits they utilize and pervert them for their own interests.
It takes a pretty cold blooded-individual, and callous soul to listen stalwartly to the shrieks of the hostage who had his head hacked off with a steak knife before a video camera, the episode subseuntly broadcast on the internet (his remains being discarded along side the banks of some nameless river somewhere like so much flotsom, jetsam and detritus ubequitus in thirdworld hell-holes), and then claim this pestilence deserves any rights whatsoever. Not only should the terrorists be rounded up and incarcerated, and then summarily executed with or without trial (it makes no difference to me), but their families should be subsequently also be taken. This includes the women and children, especially the woman and children of terrorist families. The children particularly because they grow up to be terrorists, and the women foremost because they breed terrorists.
No pity, no sorrow for their plight, not even contempt; I have no more feelings for them than I do when I sqaush a cockroach, or use a nuclear knife to eradicate some metastic tumor from my flesh. The liberal element of Western Civilization hasn't realized that the terrorists have declared war on us. They don't understand that this war hasn't been delclared against any particular or arbitrary country, but against our society, culture and way of life. And they don't understand that the war being waged by them already is that of total war. And the liberal West responds with squeemishness. The West doesn't understand that that the terrorist adheres to no rule, to no law, and cares not about whom they intend to wound, maim and kill. They hide behind the skirts of their women, they use their children as shields, and race up to locations in ambulances under the protection of the Red Cross, and then explode.
The schizophrenia of the terrorist mind is readily apparent. On the one hand they curse the tyranny of the oppressor, calling them evil, and then launch attacks from populated civilian areas such as churches, schools, residential high rise buildings, or blowing themselves up in crowded markets, hotel lobbies, and buses.
Who said that there will be peace in the Mid-East when they love their own children more than they hate us?
Let me demonstrate how these people think. Back during the days of the Cuban Missle Crises, Cuba actually had Soviet missles under its command. Che Guerra was Castro's right hand man and was in direct control of some of these missles. It came out many years later that he was actively maneauvering for a first strike nuclear attack against the U.S. Navy at the time. In an interview shortly before he died, he was asked about this. Such an attack would not have gone unanswered, nor could the loss of the Amercican fleet be. In reciprocation the U.S.S.R would've been compelled to either launch and outright invasion of Europe or a nuclear counter strike against the U.S.A. There would've been no alternative to Krushchev for such resonse, for if he'd have failed to act, he'd have been either deposed or killed (or both) very shortly thereafter, and the consequences would've ended up the same.
Guerra was asked what possible gain he forsaw by having his homeland obliterated in nuclear fire (for obliterated it would've been). Guerra responded calmly by saying the obliteration of Cuba would be an acceptable price to pay for the absolute, and certain, destruction of the U.S.A.
|