Quote:
|
Originally Posted by P_Funk
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Necessary clarifications:
1. Anyone who proclaims here, as you have done, that he "adores" a western leader who himself hero-worshipped the likes of Mao and Castro, should expect a response here. Otherwise, keep your adorations to yourself or at least do not assume that your sentiments are shared by the entire world.
2. My purpose was to point out the other side of what you brought up for conversation, which I'm sure many posters here were not even old enough to know or remember and for others to have forgotten or overlooked. Life is not only about you. Live with it.
3. When I said "who cares", I was responding to your insults at me.
|
1. His history of having an interest or friendship with Castro was not part of the discussion and as such had no material value to the topic at hand. |
That's life!
Heh. :p
Quote:
|
2. Your purpose, if as you represent it, was coloured by your own disdain for non-complimentary ideas and as such any legitimate criticism was heaved with a liberal share of something other than just academic intent. Having said that it still has nothing to do with what he was being used as an example for. George W. Bush's alleged relationship with the Saudi Royal family has nothing to do with his domestic policies on education or health care. It has a prejudicial value since its an irrelavent detail to the topic of discussion.
|
Moderators, if you feel it necessary, please cut out the relevant posts and paste them in a new "Trudeau" thread.
Quote:
|
3. Sorry for my 4 words of insult. I'll try and keep those out of my replies in the future. I don't know why you quoted the other 13 words of legitimate criticism along with it though.
|
I found the other 13 words to be your wishful thinking. My "who cares" applied to them as well.
