View Single Post
Old 06-18-07, 04:27 PM   #37
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XabbaRus
I seem to remember they were reporting on some people wanting kitchen knives banned not calling for them to be banned. Then they ran one of their have your say things, which isn't the same as calling for kitchen knives to be banned.

Is this the article? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4581871.stm or this? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4817974.stm

Can't see the BBC calling for a ban here.
Its in the reporting and choice of reporting. That is the kind of crap you are wasting your $$$ on for them to report. That wouldn't even get on the back side of a Times paper over here! Point proven - thank you.

Here is a classic given its own paragraph:

Quote:
The researchers said there was no reason for long pointed knives to be publicly available at all.
They consulted 10 top chefs from around the UK, and found such knives have little practical value in the kitchen.
Quote:
Also How can the BBC be profit oriented? It is paid for by a license fee. We all pay £130 pounds a year and this is used to fund it. The BBC doesn't have advertising in its programs. It doesn't get revenue from advertisers based on how many viewers they pull in. Yes they can and do sell production services and programmes but that isn't the same thing.
Read above - that is what I asked.
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote