[bradclark1]

Please document this. They were jamming voice frequencies. How do you know that the jamming didn't cover a very wide swath of frequencies, which also included the Liberty's?

I would assume the commander would know what he was talking about. Some bearing on this being a Signit ship and all. The aircraft carrier also reported jamming. It's in those reorts you like throwing around but some reason you don't read yourself.The high command voice circuit regardless of frequency. Do I need to translate that for you?

Once again, if it's so obvious, why isn't this pointed out as such by any of the inquiries? It should have been very easy for communication experts to have pointed this out. There were no lack of them yet no one makes any such claim.

If you read the NSA report which I'm beginning to think you haven't read squat it's on page 28.

You're obviously an expert. What are your qualification in radio communications?

I talked on them a lot.

Pilots were scrambled up in the air on the assumption of an attack. Did they have a recognition manual with them? Did they have time to look at it under the assumed circumstances of ground forces under naval attack? Did these pilots have any reason to assume there was anything down there but an Egyptian ship?

Exactly what would an assumed Egyptian cargo ship use to fire rounds 10 plus miles? The planes weren't taken under fire. What was this hurry?
The actual El Quseir did have a 3" gun on it and the maximum range would be about 6km which is a little over three miles.

Having accurate intel doesn't mean that every pilot or officer in the entire military is aware of the details. How could you even draw such a conclusion?

Thats why they call it intelligence.

Correct. That is what I assumed. Persons who were witness at the time who don't parrot the conspiracy fantasies are deemed irrelevant.

Why don't you quote the whole block.

I didn't and don't care what his name is. I'm just interested in what he's saying.

Comes across a little differently now doesn't it?

Once again (2nd time? 3rd time? 4th? I've lost track), read the transcripts on this page for NSA recordings 104 and 105.

You are beginng to look silly. I think you need to put your glasses on again.

That is what I more or less said. The communications were from just the helicopters. You know and I know that commo was intercepted from the helicopters after the attack. Why would I need to keep saying it? No communications were used by the recon plane nor fighters. Why would that be? I've read the communications documentation probably more than you have.

What don't you understand? I'm saying the only intercepted communications was helicopter communications. I don't even know what you are arguing about. Their control is guiding them or it's helicopter to helicopter. What is the problem? You can also read page 34/35 on the NSA report.

Based on wishful thinking and whether the flag blew this way or that way and in total disregard for every single transcripts for all sides involved and without a shred of evidence that anyone authorized this attack with criminal intent.
Classic kangaroo court, Mr. Kangaroo.

The reports ask's more questions then it answers. I'm amplifing those questions. Try reading the transcripts before you try quoting them.

Magical, mystical, wonderful................................
But of course, the evil pirate with the eyepatch! Just like in the movies! Oops - he had 2 legs.
Guess, guess, guess! Why not?! So what if it's baseless!

All you are doing is assuming Cristol and Nowicki are clearing Israel but you haven't even read any reports that they've put out because if you had you wouldn't be making some of the comments you're making because the information is right there.

Nope. Mine are both documented, factually pointing out the errors of the accusers and showing actual military precedents where such tragedies have happened throughout modern military history up until the most recent times.

What errors? I've answered every comment you have made with facts and all you do is answer garbage (like the above). The tragedy was intentional or unintentional? I say intentional but not condoned by the Israeli goverment.

I seem to be coming across as agressive. Not meant to be kind of.