The thing that makes me think is that the officer answering the questions said that it might be a typo on the search warrent that led them there.
Well if its a typo then wouldn't that make any search and seizure at the correct address unconstitutional since the address on the warrent isn't for the apartment they were after? I'm just wondering.
As for the atmosphere of civil liability. Lawyers didn't do anything that the courts didn't allow. If the courts had been more prudent is weeding out these pointless suits then nobody would bother suing someone for emotional distress when they bumbped into someone else. I'm not saying I don't think lawyers are a$$holes, I do. Just the courts can clamp down on this stuff but instead they let a precednet be set and now its all gone to sh1t.
__________________
|