SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Nuoz · 05-31-07, 09:52 AM

Which is the best? Can one use the AR is SH3? Seems alot faster... problem with the charting is you need to take a while. And its complicated! 3:15 second gap between mesures of distance/bearing, needing to be exact, dawing several lines in the tatical map and finally connecting the points? Oh, this only gives you the course of the target! Then more maths to make it into AoB. This is EXTREMELY difficult to do all accurately! I tried it and if i managed to get the solution to go in the general direction of what intended i was lucky. Please someone, a less complicated method for AoB. Range is pretty much straight forward. Speed is also tricky and this should require charting, but AoB is the worst! I'm getting crazy!

05-31-07, 09:52 AM	#1
Nuoz Sparky Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Here Posts: 155 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	AoB: Aspect Ratio VS Charting + maths. Which is the best? Can one use the AR is SH3? Seems alot faster... problem with the charting is you need to take a while. And its complicated! 3:15 second gap between mesures of distance/bearing, needing to be exact, dawing several lines in the tatical map and finally connecting the points? Oh, this only gives you the course of the target! Then more maths to make it into AoB. This is EXTREMELY difficult to do all accurately! I tried it and if i managed to get the solution to go in the general direction of what intended i was lucky. Please someone, a less complicated method for AoB. Range is pretty much straight forward. Speed is also tricky and this should require charting, but AoB is the worst! I'm getting crazy! __________________ "Listen, 'sir', it's real simple. Add the number of times we dive to the number of times we surface. Divide that number by two. If the result doesn't come out even, don't open the hatch"