05-29-07, 12:51 PM
|
#8
|
Sea Lord 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Port Hardy, BC, Canada 75 yo with M.S. & C.O.P.D. & heart problems
Posts: 1,930
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
Quote:
Originally Posted by melnibonian
Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
Alhtough I'm currently playing mostly GWX for the many great additions to the game, I actually prefer the NYGM model of tonnage as renown. This is more historically accurate and if the adjustments are made to make the upgrades more expensive so they are equivalent to the "old" renown system.
|
I agree with you up to a point TarJak. I think the ideal system would have been a mixed one. Renown based on tonnage with respect to merchant ships and "special renown bonus" (even in terms of medals) for sinking "important" military ships like Aircraft Carriers and Battleships. I have the feeling that this is not possible though given the current structure of GWX.
|
Mel, I think it should be possible if you edit the renown on the carriers and battleships above and beyond the tonnage. The only problem would then come from ships sunk in a harbour raid which I also think should be rewarded differently.
IMHO, the tonnage on the larger targets in the tonnage model should actually be reward enough if you get the upgrade cost balance right.
|
I think you're correct on that one Tarjak. Too bad the renown for capital ships can't be changed. My mom thinks so as well.
|
|
|