Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Redefreiheit hin, Zensursfreiheit her - I would simply prohibit it - period. This endless laissez-faire, and unlimited tolerance that burst with truckloads of reasonable criticism and how morally querstionable something is, it leads nowhere.
|
If it didn't lead nowhere there wouldn't be a problem, would it? But of course it leads somewhere:
Quote:
The West is rotting from within. We do not need foreign enemies anymore to destroy us - we do it ourselves.
|
Quote:
sick idea like this and puts it to reality, he already has proven by that that he is completely beyond reach of moral arguments and reasonable debates. So why wasting the time?
|
All prohibition is prohibited. If you didn't noticed, the show is only meant to raise awareness to the shortage of organ donors! How can you be so insensitive and cruel? People will die because of you. Anyway, the show is just a little early. It should appear after a desensitization campaign and prepare the ground for the final offensive, the legalization of the Organ market. "The young! - do not expect them to become clever and more responsibly acting in later years of their years, or when they have grown up", as you say, will not fall to it as easily, the thing is already sparking negative reactions. They may keep it in their minds but they will also have easy access to the contrary opinion. So where would it fit in the order? It sure could be used as a pre-campaign probing of public opinion. Far more reaching and broad than an opinion poll and far cheaper than a global poll - the press will help achieve the same results for free.
Collect everything that is said against it and you'll be prepared beforehand when the real showtime comes. Wether the producers know it or not, as long as the tables are not fully turned in a backfire, they may end up paying a service to the proponents of the legal organ market.