Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fatty
I have the utmost faith in our man Skybird but I would like to see an English report on this to read and weigh for myself. Anyone have any luck?
|
The news has not been reported by many german media - most jumped it completely. Die Welt also put it very fast from page one (online edition) to some hidden place, deep inside the archiv. "Die Welt" is one of Germany's leading conservative newspapers. Beyond what I said, the article says that the change was "necessary" due to new laws from 2002 and 2003 that were meant to strengthen freedom of speech. In the past, declaring your sympathy for terror organization was under penalty, and for whatever crazy reason, this they wanted to exclude from the list of misdeeds you could get penalized for. don'T ask me why somebody could argue that this is a smart move, I don't know the inside of such well-meaning brains. Die Welt reports, that the freedom of such expressions remains proteced, no matter how inhumane or disgusting it is by content (I wonder why rejecting the Holocaust is under penalty then, or Hitler's "Mein Kampf" is forbidden). The article also says that the case that triggered it all was coming from the office of the federal state attorney and was about a man spreading internet adverts and sympathizing movies for Al Quaeda, namely more than fourty such movies. In these movies, the killing of victims, past terror strikes, and the war of Al Quaeda were explicitly justified and excused. Well, he can now go on, thanks to lawmakers who have serious orientation problems concerning reality.
German constitution, article 1,1 (that is the very first basic rule in our constitution):
The dignity of man is inviolable. To respect and protect it is the duty of all state authority
Except the dignity of targets and victims of terror, and Muhammedan aggression, which are no longer protected by the constitution. Also note the articles I quoted in my reply to Frau Phillips. Maximum freedom to attack for the aggressor. no duties and obligations for him, please.
Some weeks ago a female judge argued, that a man whipping his wife acted in conformity with his culture's rule (why the hell is this well-integrating man from marocco living in Germany, when German standards have not become his standards then?), and that rule based on the Sharia. So she let him have his way, and at court even referred to the Sharia as basis of her ruling. Law experts here say that such things are just the tip of the iceberg. Sharian standards are in full drive to infiltrate and undermine the german laws and courts. Muhammeddan organizations pay huge sums and encourage colonists to go to the court in favour of some Muslim demand at every single, no matter how small an opportunity. They loose most cases, but the sheer numbers of cases nevertheless makes sure that a slow, steady progression towards sharia views of things is maintained by winning the remaining, and constantly hollowing out the laws and legal system.
Constant dripping wears away the stone .