View Single Post
Old 05-20-07, 06:46 AM   #26
mr chris
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 3,562
Downloads: 216
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Stevens
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr chris

Also why we are on the subject false advertisting which is what the devs and Ubi a guilty of. SS.com is also far from whiter than white. On the back of my copy of the game it says, "SILENT HUNTER 4 IS A KNOCKOUT" Subsim.com
Well i would like to find the guy who said that of a game when we are all honest is worse and has more bugs out of the box than SH3 had.
That was me. Go ahead, read the whole paragraph. Oh, here, let me help you:

Quote:
I can't vouch for the AI or deeper levels of gameplay from an hour in the Ubisoft media center, but visually, Silent Hunter 4 is a knockout. The dev team has covered a lot of ground in just nine months. They've refined and improved many facets of the game such as crew management, multiplayer, harbor activity, crew models, and radio traffic, and added new things like dynamic objectives, special missions, and most importantly, simulated the US submarine war in the Pacific theater. After eleven years, Silent Hunter is returning to do battle with the mighty Empire of the Rising Sun. This is one fight you do not want to miss.
Now, see how things look when you put them in context?

http://www.subsim.com/sh4/demo_sh4.php
Well thats not what its says on the back of my game Neal.
Its says and i quote

"SILENT HUNTER 4 IS A KNOCKOUT"
subsim.com

:hmm::hmmo you not think that is is not slightly missleading as it does not seem to have a link on the back of the game box to the paragraph that you just posted.
Maybe you should have held back on the sweeping statements before you had a proper chance to play the game away from the beady eyes of UBI HQ.

__________________
mr chris is offline