Quote:
|
Originally Posted by micky1up
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tchocky
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by August
Two questions:
1. Who made that chart?
2. What is the accuracy of their reconstruction?
|
http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki...econstructions
Seems fairly straight.
Micky - the Medieval Warm Period was more or less confined to the North Atlantic region. The highest temp reading there (light blue) comes from reading northern tree rings, hence the apparent global warmth. |
so you have no records of the rest of the world just the atlantic area that makes your assumptions even more worse bad bad bad science |
I'm answering your comment about the previous high temperature around 1000, which was confined to the North Atlantic area. Not the whole world, so it doesnt
really help the skeptic argument, it seems.
Obviously over time the records become more accurate and complete, thats progress. You'll notice that the various records (each line in the graph) converge as time goes on, owing to better methods of recording.
If you can find records for the Antarctic,
before anyone knew it was there, please provide them. You seem to think these are "my" records. Sorry to say, I'm not out every day with a thermometer.
Any chance of answering my replies to you instead of bleating "bad bad bad" science? I've already stated, I'm not a scientist, I'm not an expert in climatology or meteorology. I'm presenting the research of others, so lay off with the bad science schtick. I've answered your posts to the best of my half-assed ability, are you going to give anything except single-sentence replies? Go on, read over the thread.
August - I apologise. The link I posted was to the 1000-year analysis, the 2000-year (the original posted graph) is linked on that page. Any response?