Quote:
|
Originally Posted by maerean_m
We've all seen how good the game looks and yet yougamers gives it a 60. That is completely wrong, no matter how you put it. SH4 looks as good as any 2007 game. Even more, the graphics look great in the correct places with no exageration in any aspect: no useless efects to ruin the experience, just gorgeous boats, modeled to the last nit. The weather effects and the whole experience make you wonder if you're watching Discovery Channel. But no, it's a game and you're in total control of the world.
The reviewer should have given it a great mark.
This is the mistake all reviewers do this days: there is no place to tell the bad points, only places for good points. So he's forced to give a 60 mark on a game with great graphics.
|
Sooo: a game that has technical flaws galore, has stuff mentioned in the manual that doesn't work or even exist in the game, has screwy AI, has all the signs of being brought out to early (hence the MULTIPLE patches needed), but looks excellent while doing so, deserves a 10 out of 10?
:rotfl:
