I do not have time for this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OddjobXL
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Did you bother reading what you linked to? Other than a disdain for Horowitz's opinion, is there anything else there that is based on negative facts? Compare with the article I posted to above, showing point by point Brock's shoddy and shallow arguments.
|
Reading is fundamental, dear Avon Lady. Let's sort out whose comprehension carries the day here. I suss out more than disdain for for Horowitz's opinion in the Media Matters piece, I detect a disdain for the man himself which makes me suspect Brock wrote it personally. |
I'll stop quoting you right here. This side discussion began with my ROLL ON THE FLOOR LAUGH OUT LOUD response to what Ishmael said about Media Matters:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ishmael
If you are really interested in media, you should check out the media matters website at:
http://mediamatters.org/
They examine al of the mainstream media outlets, both print & video, and seperate fact from fiction & bias from unbias. |
I'll just leave here with 2 links. The first relates to the claim that Media Matters is itself unbiased:
Taking Media Matters Down a Peg.
The second link relates to George Soros, whom one might think was a swell guy, from some of your sarcastic comments above:
The Soros Monitor.
Just following verbatim quotes this man himself has stated in the past should make one sick, let alone following his actions and involvement in many ugly matters.
Fire away. I've had enough here.