Quote:
|
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skybird
|
You asked " COULD YOU BUSTER ANY OF THE MYTH BUSTING THAT THE MAN HAS CONDUCTED?".
In all capital letters no less. So I provided case law that answered your question. But now having been proven wrong you now fall back with an attempt to invalidate one of the two judges who made the ruling.
Y'know you're accuse Subman of zig zagging but you Sir are the king of the zig zag. |
Posting #234. I assume in your favour that of course you just have overseen it.
You may see that lawcase as a clear thing. I do not, for reasons indiocated by the passages I quoted from your reference. By that I pointed out my concerns, without writing another novel about it.
The judge is a bit controverse a figure indeed. Don't try to give the public an impression that by showing his background I replaced lacking arguments. I gave both.
I have adressed your request. I also said I am done in this thread. and btw, at that time I was engaged with Subman - not with you.
As a matter of fact you may have spoken in his place, but fact remains that Subman made several claims the author of the texts I linked to and quoted has put into doubt by argument and refernces, and subman was completely unwilling or unable to put up counter-arguments. And except your attempt nothing of the material was adressed. Not even concerning those points that had been made statements about before by him. Instead he started playing games to avoid the authors arguments.
If an author's well-founded and illustrated different arguments simply get ignored instead of pointing out where he is wrong, the deicussion already is dead anyway and all people only hold monologues. and I see no reason in just reformulating the many arguments that author I quoted has given. It would still be the same content anyway.
This reply only because of your indirect attack on me. As I said - I am done in this threat.