View Single Post
Old 04-16-07, 01:42 PM   #138
micky1up
Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: helensburgh
Posts: 525
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetSnake
Quote:
Originally Posted by micky1up
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetSnake
Quote:
Originally Posted by micky1up
sad that the US goverment will do nothing about the easy access to firearms in the US its time for change ban the guns i know the arguements for and against but for those who are for guns they generally are untill thier brother sister or son or daughter is killed by the 300million plus hand guns and god knows how many rifles and assault weapons ban them all get rid of this culture people think terroism is the biggest threat to the US but in fact its your way of life that is the threat
Must be slipping it only took 7 posts to begin the anti-gun/ ban them all/ diatribe. Perhaps alcohol needs to be banned. Drunk drivers kill more per year than hand guns and "assault rifles".
and one wrong makes the other wrong more right? listen to yourself the gun companies can make firearms safer the technology is thier to do it untill this ugly preventable thing happens to you and your close family you will content yourself to be an ostritch and bury your head in the sand

My family and I will defend ourselves with our own firearms if something like this ever occured. Sorry, but I will take it upon myself instead of waiting two hours for the police to save me. What is this technology you speak of that makes firearms more safer?
There are thousands of gun laws in the US now that obviously won't stop criminals from doing what they want to do . How will adding a few more do any good?

Anti-gun laws are the reasons this turned out to be such a tragedy with massive loss of life. If there were a few people with concealed carry weapons, this shooter could have been stopped. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.


and where were the guns in defence today like i said even in this country the uK criminals have always had access to guns , i would bet the person that did this up untill this event never committed a criminal act in his life but when he went beserk he had clear unobstructed access to the tools of what is now the death of 32 people what evr you say you cannot defend the gun companys they can make fire arms safein families for children with the gip activated pitol kids arent strong enough to activate em then thirs electronic fingerprint activation so only the owner of said weapon can fire it these can be used to reduce joe publics accidental deaths but hardend criminals are not the ones going into schools and blowing away people by the dozens are thy
micky1up is offline   Reply With Quote