View Single Post
Old 04-11-07, 08:24 PM   #8
Fire_Spy
Mate
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rockingham,Western Australia
Posts: 52
Downloads: 25
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henson
I teach those weapons. That show was full of crap. It used Firing Point Procedures for a weapon that wasn't shot (at the wrong type of target no less), and stock footage of a harpoon(!) leaving the water.

Take these shows with a grain of salt. The Navy only allows them to see so much, the rest is just edited in to make it more interesting by people who don't understand what they're editing to begin with. Do you think your average documentary producer really understands on any level, "match sonar bearings and shoot?"
[joke on]What? Why would the Navy want to keep that stuff secret??? [/joke off] I've seen two doco's on the Virginia Class.. One kept calling it "The Super Sub" and suggested it was an awesome anti terror weapon. The other was more of a "Hey this is a very well designed sub and this is some of how it was built" one.

As with all Documentaries about modern weapons half of what they show is either incorrect or absolute fantasy.
__________________
The Russians knew where the carrier group was, but it would move in the four hours required by the bombers to get there. Their missiles needed precise information if they were to home in on the raid's primary target, the two American and one French carrier, or the mission was a wasted effort.

The game was hide and seek, played over a million square miles of ocean. The losers died.
Fire_Spy is offline   Reply With Quote